--- title: Looking for a Firecrawl Alternative? | Tabstack description: Tabstack is a structured output API for AI agents. If you need schema-enforced JSON extraction, AI transformation, or autonomous research instead of site-wide crawling, here is how it compares. --- Firecrawl is good at what it does: crawling entire sites and producing markdown. But developers running into its limits usually hit the same two walls: 1. **No AI transformation step.** Firecrawl extracts content and crawls sites. There’s no equivalent to Tabstack’s `/generate/json`: fetch a URL, apply custom AI instructions, and return structured output in one call. If categorization, scoring, or transformation is part of the extraction job, that’s a separate LLM call you write yourself. 2. **No multi-source cited research.** Firecrawl’s `/agent` does autonomous web discovery — you describe what you want, it finds and extracts it. That’s different from Tabstack’s `/research`: a question in, multi-source synthesis out, with citations. Firecrawl doesn’t have that. Tabstack is a direct alternative for the extraction and research use cases. Here’s what you need to know. --- ## Schema-driven extraction, included Tabstack’s `/extract/json` is schema-driven: you define the shape of the data you want, pass a URL, get back exactly that structure. No separate subscription. No natural language prompt to tune. ``` import Tabstack, { APIError } from '@tabstack/sdk' const client = new Tabstack({ apiKey: process.env.TABSTACK_API_KEY }) const result = await client.extract.json({ url: 'https://example.com/pricing', json_schema: { type: 'object', properties: { plans: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'object', properties: { name: { type: 'string', description: 'Plan name' }, price: { type: 'number', description: 'Monthly price in USD' }, features: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' }, description: 'Included features' } } } } } } }) console.log(result.plans) ``` The schema is the spec. The API delivers it. --- ## Autonomous cited research - not available in Firecrawl Tabstack’s `/research` endpoint takes a question, autonomously searches the web, reads and synthesizes multiple sources, and returns a cited answer. One API call. ``` const stream = await client.agent.research({ query: 'What are the current pricing models for cloud browser automation APIs?', mode: 'fast' }) for await (const event of stream) { if (event.event === 'complete') { console.log(event.data.report) const cited = event.data.metadata.citedPages ?? [] console.log(`Cited ${cited.length} sources:`) for (const page of cited) { console.log(`- ${page.title ?? '(untitled)'}: ${page.url}`) } } if (event.event === 'error') { throw new Error(event.data.error.message) } } ``` No orchestration code. No source selection. No citation pipeline to build. Firecrawl’s `/agent` handles autonomous web discovery and extraction, but it’s scoped to extraction, not multi-source research with citation synthesis across arbitrary sources in a single call. --- ## AI transformation - also included Tabstack’s `/generate/json` fetches a URL, applies your AI instructions, and returns structured output in one call. Categorize, summarize, score, rewrite. No separate LLM step. ``` try { const result = await client.generate.json({ url: 'https://competitor.com/blog', instructions: 'For each article, identify the target audience and assign a relevance score 1-10 for a developer focused on AI agents.', json_schema: { type: 'object', properties: { articles: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'object', properties: { title: { type: 'string' }, target_audience: { type: 'string' }, relevance_score: { type: 'number', description: '1-10 score for AI agent developers' } } } } } } }) console.log(result.articles) } catch (err) { if (err instanceof APIError) { console.error(`API error ${err.status}: ${err.message}`) throw err } throw err } ``` --- ## What Firecrawl still does better Being direct: if site-wide crawling is the primary use case, Firecrawl is the stronger choice. Tabstack is a per-URL API, with no recursive link following, no sitemap traversal, no 10,000-page site ingestion in one call. If your job is bulk content ingestion into a vector store, Firecrawl’s `/crawl` is built for that. Tabstack is not. If your job is extracting structured data from specific pages, transforming content with AI, or running autonomous research, Tabstack is the cleaner path. --- ## Pricing comparison | | Tabstack | Firecrawl | | --------------------- | ------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Structured extraction | Included, schema-first | Available via `/scrape` (schema-driven, single pages) or `/agent` for autonomous multi-page | | AI transformation | Included (`/generate/json`) | Not available - requires a separate LLM call | | Autonomous research | Included (`/research`) | Partial - `/agent` for autonomous extraction; no citation synthesis | | Markdown extraction | Included (`/extract/markdown`) | Core product | | Site-wide crawling | Not available | Core product | --- ## SDK coverage Tabstack has official SDKs for TypeScript and Python. Installation: Terminal window ``` npm install @tabstack/sdk # TypeScript pip install tabstack # Python ``` --- ## Get started API key at [console.tabstack.ai](https://console.tabstack.ai). First structured extraction in under 5 minutes. [Full documentation](https://docs.tabstack.ai)